I said yesterday that one of the problems that we have is one of property, people are attached to the Church buildings which they have attended and which stand at the heart of their community. I was pulled up in the comments boxes for not 'realising that Church is not about buildings', which I agree with, but Church is to some extent about the incarnation coming to communities with the express intention of changing their lives and, as my Roman Catholic priest friend keeps saying 'making sure that the Gospel message is not lost in this bloody minded world'. If there are buildings full of people who have come to the faith - and come to the faith precisely because of the unique witness of that place (I think particularly of St Peter's London Docks and many others) - then surely we are duty bound to not only preserve this but keep it going? In Saint Hilda's here, if you talk to any of the congregation or the Parish Priest (who is seventy nine) you will find no hint of a community in crisis or of a community which is shrinking, quite the opposite.
With this in mind as well as the verifiable example of continuing Churches in this country which is that people, on the whole, do not leave their home Church and do not feel attracted to the new community, but continue worshipping and being attracted to worship by the main denominations, then I would feel duty bound to retain this unique witness.
Retain being an interesting word. It does not, in this context, mean being curator of a museum or compromising so much that we are unable to retain orthodoxy but retain as in keep. Keep our unique identity which has brought and continues bringing people to Christ and keep our buildings and good will, teaching the faith as it is taught, unwaveringly and well. To offer a National choice to National apostasy would be a fine hour for this movement.