We are in the middle of the Nativity play season now as well as the 'aargh, not more bills, mounting debt' season. Both, of course, are coming early this year as Manchester decides whether to impose another tax on ourselves in the form of a congestion charge. Tomorrow is the crunch day, months of canvassing and weeks of voting will decide whether we will cripple our city by imposing a charge to drive into the suburbs and then again into the city centre, a charge which was twenty nine times more in planning stages but which has been pulled back to get a 'yes' vote, or whether we, erm, don't impose a tax. The yes mongerers are claiming that the tax will only operate at certain times because you can trust local and national government to look a gift horse in the mouth for ever, and that it will bring revenue to better public transport and somehow make it safer. How will it be safer? Will troublemakers be microchipped to make it impossible for them to board the bus? Do we believe that the money will be used wisely, the money borrowed from central government at a time of recession? A yes vote will lead to the collapse of small businesses on the perimeter of the charging zone and a vast deficit in the coffers. A no vote will be business as usual. I do not believe the hype, I am sorry. All will be revealed tomorrow.
Thursday, 11 December 2008
Vote, Vote, Vote for Nigel Barton.
We are in the middle of the Nativity play season now as well as the 'aargh, not more bills, mounting debt' season. Both, of course, are coming early this year as Manchester decides whether to impose another tax on ourselves in the form of a congestion charge. Tomorrow is the crunch day, months of canvassing and weeks of voting will decide whether we will cripple our city by imposing a charge to drive into the suburbs and then again into the city centre, a charge which was twenty nine times more in planning stages but which has been pulled back to get a 'yes' vote, or whether we, erm, don't impose a tax. The yes mongerers are claiming that the tax will only operate at certain times because you can trust local and national government to look a gift horse in the mouth for ever, and that it will bring revenue to better public transport and somehow make it safer. How will it be safer? Will troublemakers be microchipped to make it impossible for them to board the bus? Do we believe that the money will be used wisely, the money borrowed from central government at a time of recession? A yes vote will lead to the collapse of small businesses on the perimeter of the charging zone and a vast deficit in the coffers. A no vote will be business as usual. I do not believe the hype, I am sorry. All will be revealed tomorrow.
Posted by
Andrew Teather
at
13:38